Government Wins Round 1 in Hagen Motions
David Hagen had, as documented in the previous posts from 9/25, 10/16 and 10/19, been trying to get his plea agreement (also posted here in this blog) suppressed. Well, the government has won round 1.
Order on Records Supression Motion 11252008
More to come. this order is not clear on whether or not David's own admissions and statements in his negotiated, signed and now attempted to renege plea agreement will be admitted.
This is what the pacer filing says:
11/25/2008
ORDER granting 13 Motion in Limine as to Bryan S. Kos (1), David A. Hagen (2); denying 27 Motion to Adopt Motions of Co-Defendants as to Bryan S. Kos (1); denying 25 Motion to Suppress as to David A. Hagen (2); denying 26 Motion to Suppress as to David A. Hagen (2) Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 11/25/2008. (bsw) (Entered: 11/25/2008)
The foreign affidavits and submissions are admissible in the US Government v Bryan Kos and David Hagen case. This means that all the affidavits that are used to corroborate the wiretap information, the statements made by Mark Brecher and the still unidentified "CW" (confidential witness) are admissible and likely to add many nails to the coffin.
More to come. this order is not clear on whether or not David's own admissions and statements in his negotiated, signed and now attempted to renege plea agreement will be admitted.
11/25/2008
ORDER granting 13 Motion in Limine as to Bryan S. Kos (1), David A. Hagen (2); denying 27 Motion to Adopt Motions of Co-Defendants as to Bryan S. Kos (1); denying 25 Motion to Suppress as to David A. Hagen (2); denying 26 Motion to Suppress as to David A. Hagen (2) Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 11/25/2008. (bsw) (Entered: 11/25/2008)
Even if David's own statements are suppressed, Mark Brecher's (still sealed) own plea agreement is likely to provide a wealth of information, facts and corroboration. Also, the kinds of documents covered under this order are significant and (as you have seen and reviewed within this blog) clearly help document the scope of David Hagen's (et al) crimes.
posted by ex-GTX at 7:18 AM
5 Comments:
Well, well, well. Now you/those who have denigraded and slammed us and claimed their "investment savvy" would NEVER have invested a penny in VSTC etc and called those of us that did and who followed the formula and invested in what appeared to be a viable investment based upon the very dynamics that Bernard Madhoff used to bilk 50 BILLION out of investors are soaking the Madhoff scam deep into their suck-ass bones. Now you have something else to do with your worthless ass's. Why don't you start on THAT one, you garbage gathering scumbags.
Yeah, it's me again. You know, the Supposed homosexual Marine Captain MD.
Richard Bennett MD PhD
Genetic1@myway.com
Although a scam is a scam and not good for anyone, Penny Stock fraud listed on Pink Sheets and a Ponzi scheme pulled off in the way that Madoff did DO NOT have the same dynamics. But whatever makes you feel better. Again, for the record, I hate for anyone to get scammed out of anything. And just because you are/were a Marine Captain MD (positions I repect), it doesn't change you from being a overly arrogant prick and extreme homo-phobe that likes to talk about gaydom a lot.
-Dick
A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that involves paying abnormally high returns to investors out of the money paid in by subsequent investors, rather than from the profit from any real business.Add: although the underlying formula is quite similar and the principle behind every scheme is to exploit the investor.
Now, where did any of the "Gang's" enterprises realize anything but bilking investor dollars to buy ads and media time to get more $$$ and placing the "profits in their respective pockets--and other places like houses etc.? The didn't have anything but dreams about the technology itself. SQL Minds? Come on
And as for you, my never ending insulting piece of worthless keyboard key stroke wanna be: what service did you do for your country--20 months in Nam here-- and how many ER patients went home because of your skills? But it of no use responding to any more of your keyboard anonyMOUSE lack of respect because YOU are useless and a worthless piece of work, wimp. Arrogant? You better believe it, but this "prick" would still treat your sorry ass or any of your inbreds were you to ever come to my ER or any Hospital I have and still do--from time to time--get called to. And as two of my sons and my MD daughter keep me up to date as to Hagen himself and the court proceedings---yes, I'll be there but YOU won't--you are insulting them also. So why just not get any of the free email servers and direct any comments you may have about me or my personality to MY address. It's real AND always posted at this blog. Of course that would take a "real" man to do that. Cheese anybody?
Richard Bennett MD PhD
Genetic1@myway.com
Richard - add eloquent to your long list of self-aggrandizing boasts.
You'd come off much better with a touch of humility or class. One might even take pity on some one who lost "thousands" on pinksheets.
Personally, I ALWAYS invest in anything marketed by fax and email. Can't go wrong there.
Post a Comment
<< Home